Does the Acura TL have shocks or struts?
The Acura TL uses front struts and rear shocks, with coil springs in both ends. In practical terms, the front suspension employs a strut-type setup, while the rear uses independent shocks (not rear struts) as part of a multi-link arrangement.
Across its three generations—roughly 1999–2003, 2004–2008, and 2009–2014—the TL generally follows this pattern: a strut-based front suspension and a rear suspension with separate dampers. This distinction matters for maintenance, parts replacement, and understanding how the car handles and rides.
Front suspension configuration
Before listing the key characteristics of the front suspension, note that most TL models rely on a strut-type design where the shock absorber is integrated with a coil spring. The following points capture the core elements:
- Front suspension type: MacPherson strut design (strut assembly).
- Integrated coil spring and damper within each front strut.
- Independent front suspension allows each wheel to respond to road imperfections separately.
- Common across TL generations, with variations in exact components by year and trim.
In summary, the TL’s front end uses a strut-type assembly rather than a separate, non-strut shock mounted on the wheel hub. Front struts are typically replaced as a unit, though some models may have related spring components addressed separately.
Rear suspension configuration
Before outlining the rear suspension details, understand that the TL employs an independent rear setup with coil springs and separate shock absorbers. The main features are:
- Rear suspension type: independent multi-link design.
- Coil springs support ride height and weight distribution.
- Separate shock absorbers dampen rear-wheel movement (not rear struts).
- Rear tuning complements the TL’s sport-oriented handling and ride quality across generations.
To summarize, the Acura TL uses shocks at the rear as part of a multi-link independent suspension, rather than a rear strut assembly. When servicing or replacing parts, expect to replace rear shocks rather than a rear strut unit.
Variations by generation
The TL spanned three generations (approximately 1999–2003, 2004–2008, 2009–2014). While the overall layout remained front struts and rear shocks, there were refinements in bushings, stabilizer bars, and mounting points across model years. For exact part numbers and service procedures, consult the specific service manual or dealer resources for your exact model year and trim level.
Summary
In short, the Acura TL features a front MacPherson strut suspension and a rear independent multi-link suspension with separate shock absorbers. This means front struts and rear shocks, with coil springs at both ends. Variations exist between generations, so verify parts against your exact year and trim when doing maintenance or replacements.
How do I know if I have shocks or struts?
In many cases, shocks will look like a hand pump. Struts, on the other hand, typically look like a coil spring with a shock in the center, but occasionally, the shock is mounted next to the spring. Check both front and rear wheels, as you might have both shocks on one axle and struts on the other.
Does my car have both shocks and struts?
Yes, your car has shocks or struts, and many vehicles have a combination of both, most commonly struts in the front and shocks in the rear. You can determine your specific setup by checking your owner's manual, looking for the components under your car (struts are a single unit combining the spring and shock, while shocks are typically separate cylinders), or asking a technician.
This video demonstrates how to check for bad shocks or struts: 59sWrench NationYouTube · Jun 13, 2024
How to identify shocks and struts on your vehicle
- Struts: Struts are a single structural part of the suspension that combines the spring and shock absorber into one unit. You will see the coil spring wrapped around a shock absorber that is mounted as a key structural part of the wheel assembly.
- Shocks: Shocks are standalone hydraulic cylinders that are separate from the spring. You'll see a separate spring and a shock absorber component mounted near it.
How to check for your car's suspension type
- Consult the owner's manual: Your owner's manual will have detailed information about your vehicle's suspension system.
- Inspect under the car: Look at the components connected to each wheel. If it's a single, bulky unit with the coil spring around the shock, it's a strut. If you see a separate spring and a cylindrical shock absorber, it has shocks.
- Ask a professional: During your next service appointment, ask a mechanic to identify the components and check their condition.
How much does it cost to replace struts on Acura TL?
The total cost for an Acura TL strut replacement typically ranges from $459 to $681, but it can be higher or lower depending on the specific vehicle model, year, and location. Labor costs are estimated between $211 and $267, while parts can cost between $248 and $414. For a more precise estimate, you should get a quote tailored to your vehicle.
Cost breakdown
- Parts: Approximately $248 to $414.
- Labor: Approximately $211 to $267.
- Total Estimate: Between $459 and $681.
Additional considerations
- Replace in pairs: Struts should always be replaced in pairs to ensure balanced handling.
- Wheel alignment: A wheel alignment is recommended after replacing the struts to maintain safety and ride quality.
- Variations: The final cost can vary based on your vehicle's specific year and model, as well as your geographic location. Some estimates for complete strut assembly replacements on specific models have been higher, around $1,400-$1,600.
- Professional advice: It is best to contact a local mechanic for a personalized quote.
What year to avoid Acura TL?
You should avoid Acura TL years 1999–2006, particularly 2003, due to significant transmission issues. Other years to be cautious of include 2007–2008 for a more robust transmission, but still some potential problems with the Bluetooth system and mounts, and 2009–2014 for torque converter issues. The 2010 model year also experienced excessive oil consumption.
Years with significant transmission problems
- 1999–2006: These models, especially the 2003 and early 3rd generation (2004–2006), are known for major automatic transmission failures, slipping, and hard shifting.
- 2004–2006: While better than earlier models, these are still prone to transmission failure and should be approached with caution.
Years with other notable issues
- 2007–2008: These years have a more reliable transmission, but owners have reported issues with the hands-free Bluetooth draining the battery and failing.
- 2009–2014: Some models have reported torque converter problems, which can be expensive to fix.
- 2006: This year had several recalls and issues, including a faulty display screen, power steering leaks, and frozen rear brake calipers.
- 2010: This model year is known for excessive oil consumption, with engines showing no leaks.
Years to consider for better reliability
- 2007–2008: Generally considered the most reliable, especially compared to the years immediately before them.
- 2013–2014: Some owners report these years as very reliable.
Other factors to consider
- Manual Transmission: If buying an automatic, aim for the 2007–2008 models. A manual transmission from any year is often a more reliable option.
- Vehicle Maintenance: Proper maintenance is crucial for any used car, especially for models with known issues. Thoroughly inspect the vehicle and review its maintenance history before purchasing.
