Home FAQ

Is a Honda CR-V more reliable than a Toyota RAV4?

The short answer is that both the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are exceptionally reliable in the compact-SUV segment, and which one is “more reliable” can depend on model year and the data source. In many recent comparisons, the CR-V has edged ahead in some reliability surveys, while the RAV4 scores highly in others; there isn’t a single universal winner.

In this article, we explore how reliability is measured, compare recent ratings from major sources, discuss common issues and maintenance costs, and offer guidance for buyers choosing between the two depending on priorities and year of purchase.

How reliability is measured for cars like the CR-V and RAV4

Before listing sources and results, this section describes the metrics used to judge reliability: dependability scores, owner-reported problems, maintenance costs, and repair frequency. We also note how different organizations gather data, which affects comparisons.

Reliability scores come from organizations such as Consumer Reports (CR), J.D. Power, and iSeeCars. Consumer Reports uses owner surveys and reliability data; J.D. Power uses dependability studies based on callback data; iSeeCars analyzes repair frequencies and real-world ownership trends. Each source has its own methodology, which can lead to year-to-year variation.

Primary reliability sources and what they typically show

Consumer Reports (CR): blends predicted reliability with owner satisfaction and repair frequency; redesigned models or updated trims can shift scores as new data are added.

J.D. Power: assesses dependability and quality across model years, often highlighting long-term durability and maintenance cost trends.

iSeeCars: analyzes large datasets of ownership histories and recalls to identify real-world repair rates.

These sources generally show that both the CR-V and RAV4 perform well for reliability in their class. The CR-V has often scored very highly in CR's reliability ratings, while the RAV4 frequently ranks near the top in dependability studies. Overall, the difference is typically small and year-dependent.

Reliability by model year: what the data says

Here we summarize trends from recent model years, noting that redesigns or mid-cycle refreshes can shift reliability profiles significantly in the short term. Always check the exact year and trim you’re considering, since a major update can change reliability outcomes.

Recent Honda CR-V generations (roughly 2017–2024): generally strong reliability, with some years showing minor issues related to infotainment, transmission, or HVAC; newer designs tend to improve reliability after the initial rollout.

Recent Toyota RAV4 generations (roughly 2019–2024): consistently reliable with strong long-term durability; occasional year-specific issues (often tech-related) appear in certain trims, but overall ratings remain very high.

Conclusion: Across most recent years, both models score well above average for reliability in their segment. The CR-V may edge the RAV4 in some surveys, while the RAV4 often stands as a durable benchmark for long-term resilience. The gap is usually small and year-dependent.

Cost of ownership and common issues

Understanding reliability goes beyond initial scores; it includes ongoing maintenance costs and common issues by year. Both models offer reasonable maintenance costs for compact SUVs, with each having its own strengths in service networks and parts availability.

Maintenance and repair costs: Both models have competitive maintenance costs for non-luxury compact SUVs; Toyota’s extensive service network and strong resale value are well-documented, while Honda’s maintenance costs are typically competitive as well.

Common issues by year: Most issues are minor and year-specific, including infotainment glitches, software updates, or occasional HVAC concerns. Always review the specific model-year feedback and recall history.

Resale value and long-term durability: Toyota vehicles, including the RAV4, generally command strong resale values and are known for longevity; the CR-V also retains solid value, with variances by year and engine choice.

Bottom line: Both vehicles deliver solid reliability with modest maintenance costs; the best choice may hinge on sales incentives, warranty terms, driving preferences, and the exact year you’re buying, especially if considering used options.

What to look for when evaluating reliability for your purchase

To help buyers compare the CR-V and RAV4 for a given year and trim, here are practical steps to follow:

Check the latest reliability ratings from CR, J.D. Power, and iSeeCars for the exact year and trim you’re considering.

Review owner forums and recall histories for the specific model year to identify common, year-specific issues.

Consider total cost of ownership, including insurance, fuel economy, maintenance plans, and projected resale value.

Following these steps provides a realistic picture of which model will be more reliable for your needs and budget.

Bottom line

Both the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are among the most reliable compact SUVs on the market today. The question of which is more reliable does not have a single universal answer; it depends on model year, the data source, and the individual vehicle’s history. For most buyers, either choice offers strong reliability, solid resale value, and a broad service network. Personal priorities—such as driving dynamics, interior space, and feature sets—often matter more than a precise reliability edge.

Summary

In short, the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 both deliver high reliability with small, year-to-year differences. If reliability is your primary criterion, consult the latest reports from Consumer Reports, J.D. Power, and iSeeCars for the exact year you’re considering, and weigh maintenance costs and resale value in your decision. For many shoppers, the safer bet is to expect excellent reliability from either model, with the final choice guided by features, design, and ownership experience rather than a single reliability advantage.

Which car lasts longer, Toyota or Honda?

Toyota vehicles are often considered to last longer than Honda vehicles, with many models exceeding 300,000 miles with proper care, while Honda models typically last over 200,000 miles. This is often attributed to Toyota's more conservative engineering approach, which prioritizes long-term reliability and less frequent engine or transmission design changes compared to Honda's focus on innovation.

Feature	Toyota	Honda
Longevity	Generally lasts longer, with many models lasting over 300,000 miles.	Typically lasts over 200,000 miles.
Engineering & Reliability	Known for conservative engineering and long-lasting, tried-and-true engine designs.	Sometimes takes risks with innovation, which can lead to reliability issues in some newer models.
Recent Issues	Has a stronger track record of reliability in recent years, often ranking higher in Consumer Reports surveys.	Some recent models have faced issues with turbo engines and transmissions.
Maintenance & Repair	May have slightly higher repair costs, but generally requires less frequent repairs.	Known for low repair costs and low engine failure rates, but some newer turbocharged engines may require more specific maintenance.

Who makes the best engine, Honda or Toyota SUV?

I've found Toyota engines to be a bit more reliable overall. They're known for their longevity and fewer issues over time. Honda engines are also solid and efficient, but Toyota's track record for durability tends to give them the edge in my experience.

Is RAV4 more reliable than CR-V?

The Honda CR-V is generally considered more reliable than the Toyota RAV4, though both are very dependable vehicles. The CR-V often scores higher in reliability ratings from organizations like J.D. Power and RepairPal, with lower annual repair costs and a higher ranking in its compact SUV segment.
Honda CR-V

Higher reliability scores: The Honda CR-V often receives higher predicted reliability scores, such as an 84 out of 100 from J.D. Power.
Lower repair costs: It has a lower average annual repair cost ($407) and a lower frequency of urgent repairs compared to the RAV4.
Top ranking: It has ranked 2nd out of 26 compact SUVs for reliability according to RepairPal.

Toyota RAV4

Good reliability: The RAV4 is also highly reliable, with a strong reputation for longevity, but often scores slightly lower in direct comparisons.
Lower score: For example, the 2025 model received an 80 out of 100 from J.D. Power.
Higher repair costs: Its average annual repair cost is slightly higher at $429.

Conclusion
While both vehicles are strong contenders, the Honda CR-V holds a slight edge in reliability ratings and lower maintenance costs according to recent data. However, the difference is small, and both are considered reliable long-term investments.

What are the negatives about Honda CR-V?

Honda CR-V drawbacks include an underpowered engine, particularly in non-hybrid models, and a sometimes basic or plain interior with some reported build quality issues like panel gaps and creaking. Some models also lack certain features competitive rivals offer, such as a panoramic roof, heated rear seats, and a 360-degree camera system.
Performance and powertrain

Underpowered engine: The 1.5L turbocharged engine can feel sluggish, especially before the turbo engages, and the hybrid powertrain is not as powerful as some competitors.
Engine noise: The engine can be noisy, particularly during hard acceleration.

Interior and features

Basic cabin: The interior can feel plain, with a lack of decorative trim and disappointing fit and finish elements like plastic steering wheels and panel gaps on some models.
Lack of certain features: Some higher trims still lack features like cooled seats, a 360-degree camera, and a panoramic roof, which are available in competing models.
Small screens: Infotainment screens are smaller than in some rivals, with the highest trim having a 9-inch screen and base models using a 7-inch screen.
Missing gauge: There is no temperature gauge on the instrument cluster.
Wireless charger issues: The wireless phone charger can cause phones to overheat.

Other issues

AC problems: Some models have experienced issues with the AC compressor, which can lead to leaks.
Steering issues: Some owners have reported issues with steering, which has led to recalls on certain model years.
No spare tire: Some models, especially hybrids, do not come with a spare tire and there is no underfloor storage where one could be kept.
Poor rearview camera: The rearview camera's quality has been noted as poor on some models.
Weak horn: Some drivers have described the horn as weak.
Towing capacity: The towing capacity is limited to 1,000 lbs.

Kevin Bennett

Company Owner

Kevin Bennet is the founder and owner of Kevin's Autos, a leading automotive service provider in Australia. With a deep commitment to customer satisfaction and years of industry expertise, Kevin uses his blog to answer the most common questions posed by his customers. From maintenance tips to troubleshooting advice, Kevin's articles are designed to empower drivers with the knowledge they need to keep their vehicles running smoothly and safely.