Is the Honda Integra fuel efficient?
Yes. In its class, the Integra offers competitive efficiency, especially with the standard 1.5-liter turbo configuration; the high-performance Type S sacrifices some efficiency for power.
This article examines how the Integra’s different trims and powertrain options affect real-world fuel economy, what drivers can reasonably expect in everyday use, and how to maximize efficiency without sacrificing the driving experience.
Understanding the Integra’s powertrain and efficiency
Fuel economy for the Integra varies primarily by transmission choice and by whether you opt for the standard 1.5L turbo or the high-performance Type S. EPA estimates and real-world experiences show a noticeable split between the efficient everyday drive and the track-ready acceleration of the Type S.
Powertrain options
The Integra’s efficiency depends on the following configurations:
- 1.5L turbo with a continuously variable transmission (CVT): designed for smoother, quieter operation and typically the best highway efficiency among the lineup.
- 1.5L turbo with a 6-speed manual transmission (6MT): adds driving engagement but can modestly reduce some efficiency numbers in city driving.
- Integra Type S: a performance-tuned version of the same engine family with more power and revised gearing, generally delivering lower fuel economy than the regular engine.
In practice, the CVT-equipped Integra tends to deliver the strongest highway fuel economy, while the manual can show a small drop in city driving, and the Type S prioritizes performance over efficiency.
Fuel economy by trim and transmission
The following ranges reflect EPA estimates and common owner reports for typical driving, noting that actual numbers vary by year, trim, and conditions. Use these as a guide rather than a promise of exact mileage.
- Standard Integra with CVT: roughly mid-to-high 30s mpg combined, with highway figures often in the 40s mpg under steady cruising conditions.
- Standard Integra with 6MT: generally a bit lower in city driving, with combined figures in the low-to-mid 30s mpg and highway efficiency near those of the CVT when cruising.
- Integra Type S: typically mid-20s to high-20s mpg combined, with highway efficiency better than city, but significantly lower overall than the standard models due to its power-oriented tuning.
Overall, for daily commuting and mixed driving, the standard Integra remains the more economical choice, while the Type S emphasizes performance over fuel economy.
Real-world performance and comparisons
Owners and reviewers often report real-world mpg that aligns with the general guidance above but can vary based on driving style, traffic, and terrain. Easy highway cruising and gentle acceleration tend to maximize efficiency on any Integra, particularly with the CVT. Aggressive driving, frequent heavy acceleration, and heavy loads (passengers, cargo, or roof racks) typically reduce mpg across all trims.
Tips to maximize fuel efficiency
Smart driving and routine maintenance can help you squeeze more miles per gallon from your Integra, regardless of trim.
- Choose the most efficient transmission option for your needs: CVT for higher highway efficiency and smoother cruising; manual if you enjoy engagement and are willing to trade a bit of city mpg.
- Keep tires properly inflated to the manufacturer’s recommended pressure to reduce rolling resistance.
- Plan routes to minimize stop-and-go traffic; use cruise control on highways where appropriate.
- Regular maintenance, including air filter and spark plug checks, helps maintain peak engine efficiency.
- Avoid excess weight and aero drag from roof racks when not in use to improve highway economy.
By applying these practices, most drivers can achieve fuel economy closer to the upper end of the typical ranges discussed above without compromising the Integra’s everyday usability.
Summary
The Honda Integra offers solid fuel efficiency for a small premium hatchback, with the CVT-equipped standard model delivering the strongest highway economy and the manual variant providing a modest city mpg difference. The high-performance Integra Type S is less fuel-efficient due to its power-focused setup. For most buyers, the Integra strikes a balance between engaging driving dynamics and reasonable fuel economy, and real-world results will depend on transmission choice, driving habits, and load.
Is an Acura Integra a good daily?
With its driver-focused cockpit, comfortable cabin, and advanced safety features, there's no denying that the 2025 Acura Integra is a great daily driver. You'll quickly see for yourself once you get behind the wheel.
Which Honda model is most fuel-efficient?
The most fuel-efficient Honda model currently available is the 2025 Civic Sedan Hybrid, with an EPA-estimated 50 city/47 highway MPG. The 2026 Civic Sedan Hybrid is also a top contender with 50 city and 47 highway MPG. For older models, the 2022 Honda Insight was the most efficient, achieving 55 city/49 highway MPG.
Current models
- 2025 Honda Civic Sedan Hybrid: The most fuel-efficient current model, with an EPA-estimated 50 city/47 highway MPG.
- 2026 Honda Civic Sedan Hybrid: Also an excellent choice with an EPA-estimated 50 city/47 highway MPG.
- 2024 Honda Accord Hybrid: A close second, with an EPA-estimated 41 highway MPG.
- 2026 Honda CR-V Hybrid: The most fuel-efficient SUV in the lineup, with an EPA-estimated 43 city/36 highway MPG.
Discontinued models
- 2022 Honda Insight: The most fuel-efficient Honda ever produced, with an EPA-estimated 55 city/49 highway MPG.
Is the Acura Integra good on gas?
Premium Unleaded 91 Octane Gasoline
The 2025 Acura Integra offers impressive fuel efficiency with its various trims and transmission options. The base Integra achieves an EPA-estimated 30 MPG in the city and 37 MPG on the highway.
What is the disadvantage of Integra?
However, there are disadvantages to its use; it is relatively expensive, difficult to use, and prone to infection. One of the major advantages of Integra is considered to be the improved scar cosmetic appearance and elasticity when compared to SSG alone [7], [8], [9].
