What is the MPG on a 1989 Ford Ranger 2.9 L V6?
Typically around 20–23 miles per gallon (mpg) combined, depending on drivetrain and transmission. Real-world results vary.
The 1989 Ford Ranger offered the 2.9-liter V6 in several configurations, including two- and four-wheel drive, with either manual or automatic transmissions. Because EPA labeling standards from that era differ from today, official numbers vary by model and may not map exactly to modern tests. The following breakdown covers common configurations and their approximate fuel-economy ranges, along with factors that influence mpg for vintage pickups.
Configurations and estimated fuel economy
The estimates below reflect common configurations and are approximate ranges from that era. Actual mileage can vary due to maintenance, vehicle condition, load, and driving style.
- 2WD with manual transmission (often 5-speed): about 18–21 mpg city, 24–28 mpg highway, roughly 21–24 mpg combined.
- 2WD with automatic transmission (4-speed): about 17–19 mpg city, 22–26 mpg highway, roughly 19–23 mpg combined.
- 4x4 with manual transmission: about 15–18 mpg city, 20–24 mpg highway, roughly 17–21 mpg combined.
- 4x4 with automatic transmission: about 15–17 mpg city, 21–24 mpg highway, roughly 18–21 mpg combined.
In practice, real-world mpg will vary based on engine wear, exhaust condition, tire choice, payload, towing, and overall driving style.
Additional context
For precise figures, consult the original window sticker or historical EPA data for the exact vehicle configuration. If you own or are restoring a 1989 Ranger, routine maintenance—timing, filters, tire pressure, and proper lubrication—can help sustain fuel economy closer to the margins described above.
Summary
In summary, a 1989 Ford Ranger with a 2.9 L V6 typically delivers roughly 20–23 mpg combined in common configurations, with higher figures for two-wheel-drive/manual setups and lower figures for four-wheel-drive configurations. Exact numbers depend on drivetrain, transmission, and vehicle condition.
Is the Ford 2.9 a good engine?
The Ford 2.9-liter engine is a mixed bag: it can be reliable if well-maintained but is known for a significant weak spot of cracked cylinder heads, especially after overheating. While some owners report high mileage and reliability, others have experienced the expensive head cracking issue, which is a common problem for older vehicles. It can be a decent engine if you're prepared for potential repairs, but it's a risk for those seeking a low-maintenance option.
Good points
- Can be reliable: Some owners report achieving very high mileage on these engines with only regular maintenance.
- Simple design: Its relatively simple design makes it easier for some mechanics to work on compared to more modern engines.
- Potential for performance upgrades: There are aftermarket parts available, such as performance heads, to increase power.
Bad points
- Prone to cracked heads: This is the engine's most significant weakness. Overheating can easily cause the cylinder heads to crack, leading to a costly repair.
- Expensive repairs: A cracked head is not a cheap fix, and the cost can often exceed the value of the vehicle.
- Other potential issues: Some users have reported oil leaks and lifter ticking, which can be a sign of wear.
What to know if you're buying one
- Avoid overheating: The most critical thing is to ensure the engine has never been overheated. Look for signs of coolant leaks or damage.
- Consider a rebuilt engine: If you can find one with a rebuilt engine, that would be a safer option.
- Factor in repair costs: Be prepared for the possibility of expensive repairs, especially if you plan to use the vehicle for heavy-duty tasks.
How many miles per gallon does a 2.9 L V6 get?
2.9L V6 Engine RWD MPG: 17 mpg city / 25 mpg highway.
How much horsepower does a 1989 Ford Ranger XLT 2.9 V6 have?
2.9L: 140 hp (1986–1990) 145 hp (1991–1992)
How many miles per gallon does a V6 Ford Ranger get?
And we'll do that by taking our distance driven and dividing it by the number of L we filled up. So 562 km divided by 67 L gives us 8.4 km per liter or 20 m per gallon.
