What is the MPG on a 2004 Dodge Dakota 4.7 L V-8?
In broad terms, the 2004 Dodge Dakota with a 4.7-liter V-8 did not aim for high fuel economy. Its miles-per-gallon varied by drivetrain and transmission, but typical EPA estimates placed it in the mid-teens in city driving and around 20 miles per gallon on highways for two-wheel-drive models, with lower figures for four-wheel-drive versions.
Factors influencing fuel economy
The Dakota offered two main drivetrain options—two-wheel drive (2WD) and four-wheel drive (4x4)—and transmissions that included a 5-speed manual or a 4-speed automatic in different trims. These choices, along with payload, tire size, and driving style, determine real-world mpg beyond the published figures.
EPA estimates by configuration
The following figures are typical EPA estimates reported for common configurations of the 4.7 L V-8 in the 2004 Dakota. Exact numbers can vary by equipment and testing cycle.
Two-wheel drive (2WD) options
- 2WD with automatic transmission: about 16 mpg city / 21 mpg highway
- 2WD with manual transmission: about 17 mpg city / 23 mpg highway
Conclusion for 2WD: For most 2WD Dakotas with the 4.7 L V-8, highway mileage was higher than city mileage, and manual transmissions could offer a modest highway efficiency edge.
Four-wheel drive (4x4) options
- 4x4 with automatic transmission: about 15 mpg city / 20 mpg highway
- 4x4 with manual transmission: about 16-17 mpg city / 22-23 mpg highway
Conclusion for 4x4: Engaging four-wheel drive typically reduces overall mpg, especially in city driving, though highway efficiency can still be reasonable with proper maintenance and efficient driving habits.
Real-world considerations
Actual mileage varies with load, towing, terrain, climate, and maintenance. Keeping tires inflated to the recommended pressure, using the proper fuel grade, and practicing smooth acceleration can help maximize efficiency for the 4.7 L V-8 in the Dakota.
Summary
The 2004 Dodge Dakota 4.7 L V-8 typically delivered around 16-17 mpg in city driving and 20-23 mpg on highways, with two-wheel-drive models usually achieving better highway economy than four-wheel-drive versions. Manual transmissions could offer a small efficiency edge in some configurations, while real-world mileage depends on driving conditions, payload, and vehicle upkeep.
