Loading

Are challengers faster than Camaros?

The quick answer is: it depends on the model and the metric. In straight-line acceleration, the high-performance Dodge Challenger variants typically fastest in their class, but Chevrolet’s Camaro lineup—including the potent ZL1—can rival or exceed them in many conditions. Across track performance and handling, the Camaro’s lighter weight and modern suspension often give it the edge. The real story is a model-by-model comparison rather than a blanket yes or no.


How speed is measured and what matters


Speed can mean several things: 0–60 mph times, quarter-mile elapsed times, top speed, and track performance (lap times). Weight, horsepower, traction, gearing, aerodynamics, and tires all influence the outcome. Also relevant: the Challenger and Camaro have evolved on different generations, and the Challenger’s current generation is nearing the end of its run, while the Camaro remains in active production with ongoing updates.


Model-by-model snapshot


Challenger lineup


Below are the key Challenger variants commonly compared against Camaros for performance, with emphasis on horsepower, weight, and intended use. This list highlights the extremes and the mainstream variants people actually buy today.



  • Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat — High-horsepower, older architecture focused on straight-line speed; strong acceleration compared with many peers.

  • Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat Redeye — Significantly more horsepower and torque than the base Hellcat, delivering very quick 0–60 and fast quarter-mile times.

  • Dodge Challenger SRT Demon (limited production) — Extremely quick off the line and in the quarter mile when properly equipped; now a rare collector/high-performance footnote in most garages.

  • Dodge Challenger Scat Pack — A more affordable option with a strong V8, fast but not in the same league as Hellcat variants for straight-line pace.


Conclusion: In straight-line acceleration, the Hellcat and Redeye variants generally outrun non-Hellcat Camaros, while the Demon, if found, pushes the performance envelope even further. However, the Challenger is a heavier car, which affects handling and track performance compared with lighter Camaros.


Chevrolet Camaro lineup


Below are the primary Camaro variants that are most often pitted against Challengers in performance reviews. They emphasize a blend of price, power, and handling prowess.



  • Camaro LT1 — Entry-level V8 Camaro with strong performance, good value, and balanced handling.

  • Camaro SS — Upgraded V8 with more power and performance credentials; quick 0–60 and solid track capability.

  • Camaro ZL1 — Flagship supercharged V8 with the most horsepower in the Camaro lineup; stellar straight-line speed and strong track performance for its class.


Conclusion: Camaros, especially the ZL1, can rival or beat Challengers in straight-line speed on certain tires and track conditions, and in many cases deliver sharper handling thanks to their lighter weight and modern suspension. The LT1 and SS provide compelling performance that often lands in the same neighborhood as non-Heavy-Duty Challenger variants.


Head-to-head metrics by category


0–60 mph and quarter-mile times


In straight-line acceleration, Challenger Hellcat Redeye variants typically post faster 0–60 times than the Camaro LT1 or SS. The Camaro ZL1, with its 650-hp supercharged V8, is highly competitive and can match or exceed many Challenger configurations depending on traction and tire choice. The most extreme Challenger variants (like the Demon in limited cases) can push well ahead in quarter-mile performance, but practical user experiences favor the Camaro for a broad range of setups.



  • Challenger SRT Hellcat/Redeye: strong 0–60 times in the roughly mid-3-second range for Redeye; quarter-mile typically in the low-11s depending on launch setup.

  • Camaro LT1/SS: 0–60 generally around the mid-4-second range for SS and closer to 4.0–4.3 seconds for LT1; quarter-mile often in the low-to-mid 12s depending on gearing and tires.

  • Camaro ZL1: 0–60 frequently around the mid-3-second range; quarter-mile often in the high-11s, depending on tire and track prep.


Conclusion: For pure straight-line speed, high-end Challengers have the edge over base Camaros, while the Camaro ZL1 can compete closely or surpass some Challenger variants under optimal conditions. Tire choice and launch technique play a big role in real-world results.


Top speed


Top-speed figures show the Challenger and Camaro both capable of high speeds in their performance trims, with electronic governors often limiting some variants. In practice, the top speed gap is narrower than 0–60 gaps, and both cars reach near or above 180 mph in the right configurations. Specific numbers vary by model year and equipment (tire/wheel packages, aero, etc.).



  • Challenger Hellcat/Redeye: typically near or just under 200 mph in many configurations; Demon variants pushed limits in specialized setups.

  • Camaro ZL1: commonly around 198 mph in stock form with appropriate aero and tires; SS and LT1 are much lower but still capable at high speeds.


Conclusion: Top speed is high for both, but the exact figure depends heavily on the model, options, and tires. In practice, straight-line speed tends to favor Challenger variants with the largest power outputs, yet the Camaro ZL1 remains a formidable match at the top end.


Handling and track performance


When it comes to cornering, braking, and lap times, Camaro’s lighter weight, advanced chassis tuning, and independent rear suspension typically yield sharper handling and quicker corner exits, giving it an edge on many tracks. Challengers, with their long wheelbase and more muscular straight-line bias, excel in straight-line acceleration and highway stability but can be less nimble around tight corners.



  • Camaro ZL1 and SS with performance-oriented suspensions offer strong grip and precise steering, helping clean track times.

  • Challenger variants deliver impressive acceleration stability and comfortable ride, but can feel more ponderous on tight turns.


Conclusion: For track-focused driving, Camaros generally edge out Challengers due to weight and chassis design, while Challengers dominate in straight-line acceleration and may feel more comfortable on long highway runs.


Current status and practical considerations


As of the mid-2020s, Dodge announced the current Challenger generation would wind down after the 2023 model year, with no new Challengers entering production beyond that lineup. Chevrolet’s Camaro remains in active production with ongoing updates and a broader availability of performance variants. For buyers, this means Challenger performance options exist primarily in the used market for the older, high-horsepower variants, while new performance choices continue to expand within the Camaro lineup.


Summary


In short, Challengers—especially the Hellcat and Redeye variants—offer standout straight-line speed that often surpasses Camaros like the LT1 and SS. The Camaro ZL1, with its potent supercharged V8, can rival or exceed many Challengers in acceleration and generally delivers sharper handling on a track due to lower weight and advanced suspension tuning. Overall, speed is model-specific: high-end Challengers excel in straight-line speed, Camaros tend to win on handling and track performance. When shopping today, consider your priority—straight-line speed versus agile handling—and whether you value a newer chassis and ongoing Camaro updates or the historic appeal and raw power of the Challenger lineup.

Kevin's Auto

Kevin Bennett

Company Owner

Kevin Bennet is the founder and owner of Kevin's Autos, a leading automotive service provider in Australia. With a deep commitment to customer satisfaction and years of industry expertise, Kevin uses his blog to answer the most common questions posed by his customers. From maintenance tips to troubleshooting advice, Kevin's articles are designed to empower drivers with the knowledge they need to keep their vehicles running smoothly and safely.