Does the CR-Z handle well?
The Honda CR-Z generally offers nimble, well-balanced handling with precise steering, making it feel lively in its class. However, its modest power means it isn’t a true performance car, so the driving excitement is more about chassis clarity than outright speed.
This article examines the CR-Z’s chassis, steering, suspension, and the hybrid powertrain’s influence on handling, plus what critics have said and who the car suits best. Note that production ended in 2016, so current examples reflect older technology, though the handling characteristics remain a common talking point among enthusiasts.
Chassis and handling fundamentals
Key traits reviewers associate with the CR-Z's handling are:
- Lightweight, compact platform that keeps mass low and momentum easy to manage
- Direct, communicative steering with good feedback for a small car
- Balanced weight distribution and a low center of gravity that aids cornering grip
- Suspension tuning that blends acceptable ride comfort with confident cornering behavior
Overall, the chassis design yields quick turn-in and predictable responses, making it feel lively on winding roads without being harsh on rough surfaces.
Powertrain and its influence on handling
The hybrid system shapes how the CR-Z responds in corners and during acceleration away from apexes. The electric motor provides torque at low revs to help mid-corner acceleration, while the gasoline engine broadens the rev range for steady speed changes. Honda also tuned the layout to preserve a near 50/50 weight balance, aiding stability in bends.
Transmission choices and their character
Two transmissions were available over the CR-Z's life: a traditional manual and a CVT. The manual offers more driver engagement and a sportier feel, where you can keep the engine in its sweet spot. The CVT prioritizes smoothness and fuel efficiency but can feel detached during enthusiastic driving.
- Manual transmission: more engaging, helps exploit chassis dynamics on twisty roads
- CVT: smoother, easier in everyday driving but less playful with throttle response
- Energy regeneration affects pedal feel during braking, but modern calibrations aim for a natural brake feel
For many buyers, the choice between transmissions shapes how "well" the CR-Z handles in practice: the manual version often feels more connected to the chassis, while the CVT version emphasizes efficiency and ease of use.
What critics say about its handling
Reviewers have consistently described the CR-Z as a competent handler for its class, with several noting its poised balance and responsive steering. Critics also point out that, because the car isn't power-dense, the handling can feel flat if you push for outright performance.
- Autocar praised the nimble, communicative steering and a chassis that feels eager in corners.
- Car and Driver highlighted its light, agile handling and predictable dynamics, but cautioned that torque shortfalls temper the sense of speed.
- Top Gear acknowledged solid handling and a composed ride, while noting that the hybrid’s modest power limits the emotional impact of cornering at speed.
In short, the CR-Z delivers a pleasing, agile sense of handling in a small hatchback package, especially when equipped with the manual transmission, but it is not a substitute for a high-performance sports car.
Summary
Bottom line: The Honda CR-Z handles well for its class, offering nimble, predictable dynamics, precise steering, and a balanced chassis. Its main drawback is the limited power and torque, which can dampen the sense of sportiness, particularly with the CVT. For drivers who value efficiency and driver engagement in equal measure, the CR-Z remains a capable, enjoyable option in today’s used-car market.
