Is the Subaru Forester or Outback more reliable?
In recent years, the Subaru Forester has generally shown higher reliability scores than the Outback, though both vehicles are considered dependable with proper maintenance. As of 2024–2025, major reliability trackers place Forester ratings at the higher end of Subaru’s lineup, while Outback remains solid but exhibits more year-to-year variation depending on engine and drivetrain choices.
Reliability outcomes depend on model year, engine/transmission option, and how well the vehicle has been maintained. This article synthesizes reliability data from reputable sources, outlines common trouble spots for each model, and offers practical guidance for buyers shopping new or used.
Reliability landscape across Subaru SUV models
Independent evaluations from Consumer Reports and RepairPal indicate Forester typically scores higher for reliability in recent years, whereas the Outback shows strong reliability but with greater variability tied to engine and CVT configurations. Some older 2.5-liter engines have known issues such as oil consumption, which Subaru addressed in later generations. With consistent maintenance, both models stay well-regarded for long-term ownership.
Forester reliability profile
What researchers and owners commonly report about the Forester's reliability in recent years:
- Forecasts from Consumer Reports and RepairPal place Forester among Subaru's more reliable models in recent generations
- CVT performance is a focal point: newer Forester CVTs tend to be more dependable than older units
- Powertrain and all-wheel-drive systems are generally durable with routine maintenance
- Maintenance costs are typically predictable and moderate compared with turbocharged or performance variants
Bottom line: The Forester's reliability is consistently strong across many model years, with notable improvements in CVT reliability on newer generations.
Outback reliability profile
What observers and owners note about the Outback's reliability in recent years:
- Outback reliability is solid but can vary more by year and engine choice (non-turbo vs turbo)
- Early 2010s 2.5L engines had issues with oil consumption in some examples, leading to recalls/service campaigns
- Turbo variants offer strong performance but can carry higher maintenance costs and turbo-specific concerns if not properly serviced
- CVT reliability is comparable to Forester, with potential higher costs for transmission service in high-mileage cases
Bottom line: The Outback remains a dependable option, particularly in newer or non-turbo configurations, but buyers should be mindful of engine choice and CVT history when evaluating reliability.
Practical buying considerations
To maximize reliability when shopping for a Forester or Outback, follow these steps to minimize risk and costly repairs:
- Compile complete maintenance and recall history; verify timing chain/belt status and transmission service records
- Test-drive and assess the CVT feel: smooth acceleration, absence of shudder or delay, and noise levels
- Inspect known trouble spots: head gasket history on older engines, oil leaks, suspension wear, and AWD drivetrain health
- Check for open recalls and ensure any campaigns have been completed by the previous owner
A careful inspection and solid maintenance history are key to ensuring long-term reliability in either model.
Summary
The Forester generally offers a higher reliability edge over the Outback in recent data, but both remain strong, dependable Subaru choices. For the best reliability, prioritize newer model years with proven CVT durability, review comprehensive maintenance records, and consider certified pre-owned options that include extended coverage.
