What is the gas mileage on a 1985 Ford Ranger?
Most 1985 Ford Rangers achieved mid-20s to low-30s miles per gallon on the highway and around the low- to mid-20s in city driving. The exact number depended on engine and transmission; the 2.3-liter inline-four with a manual gearbox tended to be the most fuel-efficient option, while the larger V6s used more fuel.
Engine options and their impact on fuel economy
In 1985, the Ranger lineup offered a few different powertrains. The two most common were the 2.3-liter inline-four and the V6 options (2.8-liter and 2.9-liter). Each configuration carried its own typical mpg profile, influenced by transmission choice and vehicle condition.
2.3-liter inline-four (the most common)
The 2.3L I4, especially with a manual transmission, was the most efficient setup. Expect roughly 20–25 mpg in typical city driving and around 28–32 mpg on the highway, with real-world results varying based on gearing, tune, and maintenance.
2.8-liter V6
The 2.8L V6 offered more power at the cost of efficiency. Typical figures hovered in the low 20s mpg in city driving and the mid-20s to upper-20s mpg on the highway, depending on transmission and gearing.
2.9-liter V6
The 2.9L V6 generally delivered similar or slightly worse efficiency than the 2.8L, with city mileage often in the high teens to low 20s and highway mileage in the mid-20s, again depending on drivetrain and condition.
Typical mpg ranges by configuration
Common configurations and their approximate fuel economy ranges based on period EPA estimates and typical owner experiences.
- 2.3L inline-four with manual transmission (4- or 5-speed): roughly 21–25 mpg in city driving, 28–32 mpg on the highway; combined around 25–28 mpg.
- 2.3L inline-four with automatic transmission: roughly 19–22 mpg city, 27–30 mpg highway; combined about 23–25 mpg.
- 2.8L or 2.9L V6 (any transmission): roughly 18–21 mpg city, 24–28 mpg highway; combined around 20–23 mpg.
These ranges reflect era EPA ratings and typical real-world results. Actual numbers vary with mechanical condition, tire size, driving style, and cargo load.
Maintenance and driving practices today can meaningfully affect mileage. The following factors commonly influence your vintage Ranger’s efficiency:
To help you estimate today’s mileage and perhaps improve efficiency, consider these practical factors and tips.
- Keep ignition, fuel, and emissions systems properly tuned (timing, spark plugs, filters, and vacuum leaks).
- Maintain correct tire pressure and align wheels to minimize rolling resistance.
- Lighten the load and remove unnecessary accessories that add weight or drag.
- Use the appropriate octane fuel and ensure carburetion/EFI tuning is appropriate for the engine setup.
- Plan routes to avoid stop-and-go driving when possible; smooth acceleration helps fuel economy.
Even with good maintenance, expect real-world mpg in the low- to mid-20s for V6 configurations and somewhat higher figures for the 2.3L manual setups, with wide variation based on condition and driving conditions.
Summary
The 1985 Ford Ranger offered a range of powertrains that produced a spectrum of fuel economy results. The 2.3L four-cylinder, especially with a manual transmission, generally delivered the best efficiency, often in the high 20s to low 30s mpg on highways and mid-20s in city driving. V6 models tended to consume more fuel. Today, proper maintenance and mindful driving can help maximize mpg for these classic pickups, but actual results will vary widely based on how the truck has aged and how it’s driven.
Additional notes
For precise numbers on a specific truck, consult the original owner’s manual, vintage EPA-era brochure data, or a trusted restoration source that documents the exact drivetrain configuration and gearing for that model year.
What year of Ford Ranger to stay away from?
You should generally stay away from the 1999, 2001, 2002, and 2004-2006 Ford Ranger model years due to significant reliability issues like transmission, engine, and other mechanical problems. The 2019 model is also a year to be cautious of, as it had first-year kinks for the newer generation that are still being worked out.
Older models to avoid
- 1999: Considered one of the worst years, with problems in the engine, transmission, suspension, and electrical systems.
- 2001: A continuation of the problems from the previous year, with added issues related to airbags and wiring.
- 2002: Had a high number of recalls and complaints, particularly related to engine and transmission issues.
- 2004–2006: These years had frequent engine problems and other issues, with 2004 and 2006 seeing a higher number of recalls and complaints.
Newer models to approach with caution
- 2019: As the first model year for the current generation, it had some "first-year kinks" and issues that were being addressed. While not a complete lemon, it's a year to be aware of when shopping for a newer used Ranger.
Are 1985 Ford Rangers reliable?
1985 Ford Ranger: First Generation
CarSurvey documents multiple examples of owners who have achieved over 300,000 miles in their '85 models, and those owners have nothing but praise for the reliability of their Ranger's powertrain.
Which Ford Ranger has the best gas mileage?
The Best Ford Ranger Model for Fuel Efficiency
The 2WD Ford Ranger XL is the most fuel-efficient model, offering 23 MPG combined, making it a great choice for those who prioritize fuel economy.
How many miles per gallon does a 1984 Ford Ranger get?
It combines a 5-Speed Manual with a fuel economy of 22 MPG and is available with a RWD drivetrain, making it both powerful and efficient for all business needs.
