Which is larger, the Toyota Sequoia or the Grand Highlander?
The Toyota Sequoia is the larger vehicle overall when you compare exterior footprint and overall size to the Grand Highlander.
To understand how the two SUVs stack up, this article examines official measurements and practical space considerations, including length, wheelbase, height and how interior cargo space varies with seating configurations. Readers will see why one model may feel roomier or easier to park than the other depending on what you value most—overall size or versatile cargo and passenger space.
Exterior footprint
Key measurements define a vehicle’s footprint: overall length, wheelbase, width and height. Here’s how the Sequoia and Grand Highlander compare on those basics.
- Overall length: The Sequoia is longer than the Grand Highlander. The full-size Sequoia typically stretches to roughly 210–212 inches, while the Grand Highlander sits a bit shorter, around the low 200s inches.
- Wheelbase: The Sequoia’s wheelbase is longer, giving it a stretched stance that contributes to its full-size SUV feel. The Grand Highlander has a shorter wheelbase, more in line with midsize SUV proportions.
- Width: Both models are broadly similar in width, generally in the high 70s inches, with only slight variation by trim.
- Height: The Sequoia is taller, reflecting its boxier, full-size SUV profile. The Grand Highlander sits lower in height, aligning with its midsize-to-large footprint.
In straightforward terms, the Sequoia occupies more space on the road and in most garages, while the Grand Highlander remains substantial but within a mid-to-full-size crossover envelope.
Interior space and cargo practicality
Interior layout and cargo capacity are shaped by where the third row sits and how the second row folds. This section looks at potential practicality for families and gear-heavy uses.
- Third-row impact on cargo: The Sequoia’s third row reduces available cargo behind the third row more noticeably than the Grand Highlander, reflecting its larger exterior size. The Grand Highlander tends to offer more usable space behind the third row in its three-row configuration.
- Second-row and overall interior volume: The Sequoia emphasizes generous interior dimensions typical of a full-size SUV, which can translate to substantial second-row and overall cabin space. The Grand Highlander expands interior volume within a midsize footprint, often delivering competitive passenger space and a flexible cargo layout.
- Practical considerations: If you prioritize maximum exterior presence and robust cargo capacity behind the second row, the Sequoia has the edge. If you want a roomy three-row cabin with more accessible cargo behind the third row in a slightly smaller overall package, the Grand Highlander is compelling.
Both models offer three-row seating and strong cargo handling, but their design goals diverge: the Sequoia leans toward full-size scale, while the Grand Highlander prioritizes versatile space within a midsize framework.
Notes on model-year variation
Dimensions can vary by trim, options and year. Always check the latest official Toyota specifications for the exact numbers on the configuration you’re considering.
Bottom line for buyers
For sheer exterior size, the Sequoia is the larger vehicle, featuring a longer length and wheelbase and a taller profile. If interior versatility and cargo access behind the third row within a slightly smaller footprint are your priorities, the Grand Highlander offers strong capability in a more compact package.
Summary
The Toyota Sequoia outsize the Grand Highlander in overall exterior footprint and height, a hallmark of its full-size SUV design. The Grand Highlander, while still substantial and spacious, sits on a midsize platform with a focus on versatile cargo space and passenger comfort. In choosing between them, consider whether you value maximum exterior size and second-row cargo capacity (Sequoia) or a roomy, flexible interior within a slightly smaller footprint (Grand Highlander).
