Which is the best Honda CR-V engine to buy?
The turbocharged 1.5-liter engine is the most balanced pick for most buyers, offering solid everyday performance with respectable efficiency. If maximum fuel economy and a quiet, smooth ride are top priorities, the CR-V’s hybrid powertrain is the best choice, though it comes with a higher upfront cost and different driving characteristics. The right engine depends on how you plan to use the vehicle, your budget, and what you value most in ownership.
Today’s Honda CR-V lineup centers on two primary powertrains: a 1.5-liter turbocharged inline-four paired with a continuously variable transmission (CVT) and the e:HEV hybrid system that combines a 2.0-liter Atkinson-cycle engine with electric motors and an electronic continuously variable transmission (e-CVT). Both offer Honda’s hallmark reliability, but they cater to different priorities in terms of performance, efficiency, cost, and maintenance considerations.
Turbocharged 1.5-liter engine: balance of power and efficiency
For buyers who want a responsive, versatile drivetrain without venturing into a plug-in or hybrid setup, the 1.5L turbo is typically the default choice. It blends capable on-road performance with competitive fuel economy, and it remains the most affordable way to equip a new CR-V with the brand’s modern multiport turbo technology.
- Pros: Strong acceleration for a compact SUV, especially in highway merging and passing scenarios; smooth and predictable power delivery through the CVT; solid fuel economy for a turbo engine in daily driving; broad dealership parts and service support; accessible pricing relative to the hybrid variant.
- Cons: Real-world fuel economy generally trails the hybrid by a notable margin, particularly in city driving; the early turbo engines in some model years carried concerns about oil dilution and related service advisories, though Honda has issued updates and many owners report solid reliability with proper maintenance; the CVT can feel less engaging than traditional automatics for some drivers; some noise and refinement trade-offs under boost compared with the hybrid’s refined electric assistance.
Overall, the turbocharged 1.5-liter remains the pragmatic choice for buyers who want a balanced blend of power, efficiency, and affordability, with the flexibility of a conventional internal-combustion setup and straightforward servicing.
Hybrid e:HEV powertrain: best for fuel economy and refined urban driving
The CR-V e:HEV pairs a 2.0-liter Atkinson-cycle engine with two electric motors to deliver smooth, quiet operation and exceptional real-world fuel economy, particularly in city and mixed driving. If you prioritize low fuel costs and a serene driving experience, the hybrid is hard to beat in its class, even if it isn’t the quickest CR-V variant off the line.
- Pros: Best-in-class-like fuel efficiency for many daily-driving scenarios (often around or above 40 mpg combined, depending on road conditions and trim); exceptionally smooth operation with minimal engine noise at low speeds thanks to electric assist; AWD is available without requiring a plug-in charging setup; strong, steady torque from electric motors aids everyday usability; favorable resale dynamics in some markets due to efficiency credibility.
- Cons: Higher upfront purchase price compared with the turbo model; the driving feel can be less sporty due to emphasis on efficiency and electric assistance; slightly reduced cargo space in some trims due to battery packaging; maintenance costs for hybrid components can be higher if long-term reliability concerns arise (though the system has a solid reliability track record so far).
For buyers who spend a lot of time in stop-and-go traffic or who want the absolute best fuel economy without plugging in, the hybrid wins on efficiency and refinement, even if it isn’t the quickest CR-V variant.
What to consider when choosing your CR-V powertrain
To help guide your decision, consider how you plan to use the SUV, your budget, and ownership expectations. Use these criteria to weigh the two main powertrains against your needs.
- Your typical driving: city commutes with short trips favor the hybrid; mixed or highway-heavy driving favors the turbo for stronger passing power.
- Total cost of ownership: hybrid may offer lower fuel costs but higher upfront price and potentially higher maintenance costs over time; turbo generally offers lower initial cost and easier maintenance.
- Incentives and resale: hybrids can carry favorable incentives in some regions and may retain value well due to fuel-efficiency perception.
- Cargo and space considerations: hybrid configurations can slightly affect cargo space with battery packing, though the difference is small in latest models.
- Reliability and maintenance: both powertrains are backed by Honda’s reliability history; check service bulletins for the turbo variant if buying used from earlier years.
Answering these questions will help you determine which CR-V powertrain aligns with your budget, driving style, and long-term ownership expectations.
Summary
In 2025, the Honda CR-V offers two clear powertrain paths: the turbocharged 1.5-liter engine for a strong overall balance of performance and efficiency, and the e:HEV hybrid for exceptional fuel economy and refinement. For most buyers, the turbo engine represents the best all-around value and versatility, while the hybrid suits those prioritizing fuel savings and city driving. Test-driving both configurations and calculating total ownership costs will ensure you choose the engine that best fits your lifestyle and budget.
Which Honda engine is better, 2.4 or 1.5 turbo?
The turbo option provides a few extra horsepower but offers slightly less torque than the naturally aspirated 2.4L engine. When comparing EPA milage estimates, the difference is only a couple miles in favor of the 1.5L, so nothing dramatic.
Is the 1.5 or 2.0 Honda better?
The 1.5L turbocharged 4-cylinder engine leads in both power and fuel efficiency. This is because turbocharged engines feature an internal fan and cooling system that keeps the engine at an optimal temperature during peak performance. It gives the engine that added boost while reducing the risk of overheating.
What is the most reliable Honda CR-V?
The most reliable Honda CR-V years are generally considered to be models from 2017 to 2022, particularly those with the 2.4L engine, while the 2006 and earlier models with the older engines are also highly reliable. However, avoid the 2017-2020 models with the 1.5L turbocharged engine due to potential head gasket issues.
Reliable model years
- 2017-2022: Widely considered to be reliable, with many owners reporting high satisfaction. The 2016 model is also praised for its reliability.
- 2006: This year is frequently cited as one of the most reliable due to its simplicity and lack of modern infotainment issues. The only major concern is the Takata airbag recall, which should have been addressed.
- 2007-2019: These years, especially those with the 2.4L engine, are seen as very reliable.
Years to avoid
- 2017-2020 (with 1.5L turbo engine): Some owners and mechanics report potential problems with head gaskets on these models, so it is advisable to stay away from the 1.5L turbo engine if possible.
- 2017: Some owners reported alignment issues with the 2017 model.
Key considerations
- Engine: The 2.4L engine is generally seen as more reliable than the 1.5L turbocharged engine.
- Maintenance: Proper and consistent maintenance is crucial for the longevity of any vehicle, regardless of the model year.
- Trim level: The EX or Touring trims are good options for those seeking a good balance of features and reliability, says Brickell Honda.
What is the best engine for the Honda CR-V?
Conclusion: The best Honda CR-V engines of all generations
The Honda CR-V 2.0 i-VTEC (Generation III, 150 hp) combines legendary reliability with ample power and low fuel consumption - an engine that easily manages 400,000+ kilometers.
