Which is wider, charger or challenger?
The two Dodge performance staples are essentially the same width, each about 75 inches across in recent model years. In practice, there is no meaningful width difference between the Charger and the Challenger.
To understand the comparison, it helps to look at how width is defined in factory specs and how these cars are built. Width measurements can vary slightly depending on whether side mirrors are included and which trim level is being reported.
Official dimensions and how they’re measured
Before listing the numbers, note that manufacturers sometimes present widths differently: some specify width with mirrors, others exclude them. For consumers, the takeaway is that the two cars share a similar footprint despite their different body styles.
Below are approximate figures commonly cited for recent Dodge Challenger and Charger models:
- Challenger: About 75.0 inches (190.5 cm) in overall width. This figure is typical across modern trims and reflects the car’s coupe footprint.
- Charger: About 75.0 inches (190.5 cm) in overall width. Similar to the Challenger, with minor variations depending on year and measurement method.
These numbers show that width is not a distinguishing factor between the two models; both occupy a nearly identical footprint on the road.
Practical implications
For most buyers, the decision between Charger and Challenger should focus on style, seating and cargo needs, and driving dynamics rather than a measurable difference in width. The sedan’s four doors and the coupe’s two-door layout influence interior space and usability, but not the overall width in any appreciable way.
Garage clearance, parking considerations, and curb appeal are similar for both cars, with the primary differences being length, height, and interior configuration rather than a broad gap in width.
Notes on current availability
Dodge has shifted its lineup away from these nameplates in some markets and model years, with newer vehicle availability varying by region. If you’re shopping, rely on the exact specs for the year you’re considering, but expect the width to be effectively equal between Challenger and Charger in the last-generation configurations widely sold.
Summary
The Dodge Charger and Dodge Challenger are essentially the same width, with official figures around 75 inches for recent models. Differences between them are driven more by body style, interior layout, and practicality than by any notable disparity in width.
Is the Charger smaller than the Challenger?
The Dodge Charger has a wheelbase that is 120 inches, while the Challenger has a wheelbase that measures 116.2 inches. Even though the Challenger is slightly smaller than the Charger, both vehicles provide a sleek design and the space you need.
How many inches wide is a Dodge Charger?
Dodge Charger (2024)
| Dodge Charger | |
|---|---|
| Wheelbase | 121.0 in (3,073 mm) |
| Length | 206.6 in (5,248 mm) |
| Width | 79.8 in (2,027 mm) |
| Height | 58.9–59.0 in (1,496–1,499 mm) |
Is a Challenger wider than a Charger?
Compare the Charger and Challenger: Exterior Features
The exterior design of the Charger could not be more different from that of the Challenger. The Charger's build is much larger and more modern, whereas the Challenger is wider and features a vintage look.
What's the difference between Challenger and Charger?
The main difference is the body style: the Challenger is a two-door coupe, while the Charger is a four-door sedan. The Charger offers more rear passenger space and legroom, making it more practical for carrying adults, while the Challenger has a more classic, two-door muscle car aesthetic. Both vehicles offer a similar range of performance-oriented engine options and technology features, with performance being very close between the two.
| Feature | Dodge Challenger | Dodge Charger |
|---|---|---|
| Body Style | Two-door coupe | Four-door sedan |
| Rear Legroom | 33.1 inches | 40.1 inches |
| Trunk Space | 16.2 cubic feet | 16.5 cubic feet |
| Transmission | Offers both automatic and 6-speed manual options | Offers only an 8-speed automatic transmission |
| Aesthetics | Classic two-door muscle car look | More elegant, four-door design |
(this||self).Wufxzb=function(c,e,f,l,k){var d=document.getElementById(c);if(d&&(d.offsetWidth!==0||d.offsetHeight!==0)){c=d.querySelector("div");var g=c.scrollWidth-c.offsetWidth,h=Math.min(e?g:0,g);c.scrollLeft=e&&(l||f)?0:h;var a=d.getElementsByTagName("g-left-button")[0],b=d.getElementsByTagName("g-right-button")[0];a&&b&&(e=RegExp("\\btHT0l\\b"),f=RegExp("\\bpQXcHc\\b"),a.className=a.className.replace(e,""),b.className=b.className.replace(e,""),h===0?a.className="pQXcHc "+a.className:(a.className=
a.className.replace(f,""),k&&c.classList.add("pA30Ne")),h===g?b.className="pQXcHc "+b.className:(b.className=b.className.replace(f,""),k&&c.classList.add("FpCCub")),setTimeout(function(){a.className+=" tHT0l";b.className+=" tHT0l"},50))}};}).call(this);(function(){var id='_Xt0laeT8D6-M9u8PyZ768As_124';var rtl=false;var gecko=false;var edge=false;var soh=false;
(this||self).Wufxzb(id,rtl,gecko,edge,soh);})();
Key takeaways
- For practicality: The Charger is the better choice due to its four doors and larger rear legroom, which makes it more comfortable for passengers.
- For classic style: The Challenger has a more traditional, two-door coupe silhouette that many associate with classic muscle cars.
- For performance: The vehicles have very similar, high-performance engine options, and the overall performance is nearly identical between the two.
- For transmission choice: If a manual transmission is a must-have, the Challenger is the only option between the two.
