Which is bigger, a Subaru Outback or a Crosstrek?
The Subaru Outback is bigger overall than the Crosstrek, with a longer body, wider footprint, and more cargo space.
Subaru’s Outback and Crosstrek share a rugged design and all-wheel-drive capability, but they occupy different spots in the lineup. The Outback is a midsize wagon built for longer trips and more gear, while the Crosstrek is a compact crossover aimed at city driving with light off-road use. This analysis compares the latest model-year dimensions and cargo figures to determine which vehicle is physically larger.
Size and dimensions
Key exterior measurements compare length, width, height, and wheelbase for the current model years.
- Outback length: about 191 inches; Crosstrek length: about 176 inches.
- Outback wheelbase: about 108 inches; Crosstrek wheelbase: about 104 inches.
- Outback width: around 73 inches; Crosstrek width: around 71 inches.
- Outback height: about 66 inches; Crosstrek height: roughly 63–64 inches.
Across these exterior dimensions, the Outback sits longer, wider, and taller than the Crosstrek, and with a longer wheelbase, it tends to offer a steadier highway feel and more interior stretch.
Cargo capacity and interior space
To understand practical space, we compare cargo volume behind the rear seats and with the rear seats folded, which are the standard measures buyers use when evaluating usefulness for gear and luggage.
- Outback cargo behind rear seats: about 32–33 cubic feet; with seats folded: about 75–76 cubic feet.
- Crosstrek cargo behind rear seats: about 20–21 cubic feet; with seats folded: about 55–56 cubic feet.
In practical terms, the Outback offers significantly more cargo space—roughly 10–12 more cubic feet behind the rear seats and around 20 cubic feet more with the rear seats folded—making it notably more capable for gear and luggage.
Other considerations
Beyond size, buyers weighing the two models should consider price, fuel economy, and day-to-day practicality. The Outback generally starts higher and offers more interior space and power, while the Crosstrek tends to be more nimble, easier to park, and may deliver slightly better fuel efficiency in certain trims.
Practical takeaways
For families needing more cargo and passenger comfort on long trips, the Outback is the clearer choice. For singles or couples who want a compact, efficient AWD crossover with solid off-road capability, the Crosstrek remains a compelling option.
Summary: The Outback is bigger than the Crosstrek in exterior dimensions and cargo capacity, delivering more space for people and gear, while the Crosstrek offers a smaller footprint with strong efficiency and city-friendly practicality.
