Whats more reliable, Forester or Outback?
When it comes to choosing between the Subaru Forester and Outback, reliability is a key factor to consider. Both models have a reputation for durability, but there are some differences in their reliability that may sway your decision.
Forester: A Compact SUV with a Solid Reputation
The Subaru Forester is a compact SUV that has consistently ranked among the most reliable vehicles in its class. According to Consumer Reports, the Forester has above-average predicted reliability, with a score of 4 out of 5 for the latest model year. The Forester's rugged construction, standard all-wheel-drive, and well-engineered powertrain contribute to its reputation for dependability.
Outback: A Versatile Crossover with Proven Reliability
The Subaru Outback, a crossover wagon, is also known for its reliability. Like the Forester, the Outback has received a 4 out of 5 predicted reliability rating from Consumer Reports. The Outback's combination of off-road capability, spacious interior, and comfortable ride have made it a popular choice for families and outdoor enthusiasts alike. Its long-standing reputation for durability is a key selling point.
Comparing Reliability Factors
When it comes to specific reliability factors, both the Forester and Outback perform well. They share Subaru's renowned all-wheel-drive system, which is known for its longevity and low maintenance requirements. Additionally, both models are equipped with Subaru's reliable boxer engines, which have a reputation for being durable and easy to service.
That said, the Forester may have a slight edge in terms of overall reliability, as it tends to have fewer reported issues with its electrical systems and interior components compared to the Outback. However, the differences are relatively minor, and both models are considered highly reliable choices in their respective segments.
Conclusion
In summary, both the Subaru Forester and Outback are excellent choices for those seeking a reliable, durable vehicle. While the Forester may have a slight edge in overall reliability, the Outback's versatility and off-road capabilities make it a compelling alternative. Ultimately, the decision between the two will depend on your specific needs and preferences, but you can't go wrong with either model when it comes to reliability.
Where does the Subaru Forester rank in reliability?
Reliability Rankings
They've been a resource in the industry for more than 50 years. After evaluating the 2025 Subaru Forester on its level of defects, malfunctions, and design flaws, it gave the SUV a Quality and Reliability score of 83 out of 100, which is considered great.
Which Subaru model is most reliable?
The Subaru Crosstrek and Forester are consistently cited as Subaru's most reliable models, with the Crosstrek often receiving the top spot in recent years for its long-term dependability and low maintenance costs. The Outback is also a highly reliable and popular option, particularly for those who need more space. All three models benefit from Subaru's symmetrical all-wheel drive, which contributes to their stability and durability.
Most reliable models
- Subaru Crosstrek: Frequently ranked as the most reliable model, it is known for its long-term dependability and lower maintenance costs. Its standard all-wheel drive and available ground clearance make it a versatile and durable choice.
- Subaru Forester: A highly reliable and long-lasting SUV, the Forester consistently receives high marks for its safety and durability. Many drivers achieve over 200,000 miles with proper maintenance.
- Subaru Outback: A top choice for reliability, the Outback offers a great balance of dependability, features, and resale value. Its versatile design makes it a great option for both daily commutes and adventures.
Other reliable options
- Subaru Impreza: A dependable option, especially if you're looking for a more compact car.
- Subaru BRZ: Also recommended by Subaru of America, the BRZ is another reliable model in the lineup.
Tips for maximizing reliability
- Consistent maintenance: Routine oil changes and other scheduled maintenance are crucial to ensure any Subaru model lasts for the long haul.
Which is more reliable, Forester or Outback?
The Subaru Forester is generally considered slightly more reliable than the Outback, largely due to its simpler, non-turbocharged engine which can lead to lower maintenance costs over the long term. However, both models are known for strong reliability and share many components. Recent ratings from J.D. Power show the Forester edging out the Outback, but both score well.
Forester vs. Outback reliability comparison
You can watch this video for a comparison of the Forester and Outback models: 56sCarLandTVYouTube · Apr 4, 2025
| Feature | Subaru Forester | Subaru Outback |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | Standard 2.5L naturally aspirated engine; considered more reliable and cheaper to maintain due to its simplicity. | Standard 2.5L engine; optional 2.4L turbocharged engine is available. The turbocharged engine, while more powerful, may have higher maintenance costs. |
| J.D. Power Reliability | Rated higher, with scores around 83/100. | Rated slightly lower than the Forester, with scores around 80/100. |
| Trouble Spots | Some models have reported issues with in-car electronics. | Some models have reported issues with in-car electronics and climate system. |
| Long-term cost | Estimated long-term maintenance costs are slightly lower than the Outback, primarily due to the simpler engine. | Estimated long-term maintenance costs are slightly higher due to the potential for more complex issues with the optional turbo engine. |
(this||self).Wufxzb=function(c,e,f,l,k){var d=document.getElementById(c);if(d&&(d.offsetWidth!==0||d.offsetHeight!==0)){c=d.querySelector("div");var g=c.scrollWidth-c.offsetWidth,h=Math.min(e?g:0,g);c.scrollLeft=e&&(l||f)?0:h;var a=d.getElementsByTagName("g-left-button")[0],b=d.getElementsByTagName("g-right-button")[0];a&&b&&(e=RegExp("\\btHT0l\\b"),f=RegExp("\\bpQXcHc\\b"),a.className=a.className.replace(e,""),b.className=b.className.replace(e,""),h===0?a.className="pQXcHc "+a.className:(a.className=
a.className.replace(f,""),k&&c.classList.add("pA30Ne")),h===g?b.className="pQXcHc "+b.className:(b.className=b.className.replace(f,""),k&&c.classList.add("FpCCub")),setTimeout(function(){a.className+=" tHT0l";b.className+=" tHT0l"},50))}};}).call(this);(function(){var id='_lMclacqVIciHkdUPsa2iwQc_254';var rtl=false;var gecko=false;var edge=false;var soh=false;
(this||self).Wufxzb(id,rtl,gecko,edge,soh);})();
Key takeaways
- For the most reliable option: The Forester is the safer bet, especially if you plan to own the vehicle for a long time, due to its simpler engine design.
- For higher performance: If you opt for the turbocharged engine in the Outback for more power, be prepared for potentially higher maintenance costs compared to the Forester.
- For strong reliability: You can't go wrong with either choice. Both the Outback and Forester are known for being durable and reliable vehicles with proper maintenance.
- Maintenance: Regardless of the model, both Subaru engines require consistent maintenance to ensure long-term reliability.
What are the downsides of a Subaru Forester?
Common Subaru Forester cons include slow acceleration, a less refined engine, and potential issues with the continuously variable transmission (CVT). Other drawbacks are a bouncy ride over large bumps, lower-than-expected cargo capacity compared to some rivals, and a less innovative infotainment system. Older models also have a history of specific problems like head gasket failure, which buyers should be aware of, notes CoPilot for Car Shopping.
Performance and handling
- Lack of power: Acceleration is often described as leisurely due to the engine's modest horsepower and torque output.
- CVT issues: Some owners report shaking or jerking, particularly when accelerating from a stop, which can be related to the CVT.
- Ride quality: The ride can be uncomfortable over large bumps, feeling bouncy despite being generally pleasant.
- Refinement: The engine lacks the refinement of competitors, and the boxy shape contributes to wind noise.
Design and technology
- Cargo space: The cargo area is significantly smaller than some top competitors in the segment.
- Infotainment: The infotainment system can have touch sensitivity issues and may be less innovative than some rivals.
- Driver assist issues: Some owners have reported issues with the alerts from driver assistance features, notes Edmunds.
Reliability (older models)
- Engine problems: Older generations, particularly from 1998-2002, are known for head gasket failures. Subsequent models (2003, 2006, 2009-2010) have also seen issues with head gaskets and other engine problems.
- Oil consumption: Some model years, particularly between 2011-2013, have been plagued by excessive oil consumption.
