Which is bigger, Forester or Outback?
In most size metrics, the Outback is bigger than the Forester, thanks to a longer body and wheelbase. The Forester, however, sits taller with a higher roofline, which translates into more headroom. Between the two, cargo and passenger space are similar enough that the choice often comes down to whether you prioritize a longer footprint or loftier interior height.
To understand the comparison more clearly, here is a detailed look at how the two models stack up on the key measurements buyers care about, based on current-generation vehicles (roughly 2024–2025 models). Specific figures can vary by trim or options, so consult the latest Subaru specs for exact numbers.
Size and footprint at a glance
Before listing the main metrics, note that “bigger” can mean overall footprint or usable interior space. The following figures reflect widely cited dimensions for recent model years.
- Overall length: Outback is longer, around 191 inches, while Forester sits closer to 182 inches.
- Wheelbase: Outback has a longer wheelbase, about 108 inches versus the Forester’s roughly 105 inches.
- Width and height: Forester is a touch taller with a higher roofline; Outback is slightly wider but has a lower roof profile.
- Cargo area with rear seats up: Outback and Forester are close, typically around 32 cubic feet for the Outback and about 31 cubic feet for the Forester, depending on year and trim.
- Cargo area with rear seats folded: Both models reach into the mid- to upper-70s cubic feet, with slight variations by year and trim.
In practical terms, the Outback’s longer body creates a more extended footprint, which can affect parking and garage fit. The Forester’s taller stance translates into more vertical space inside, which can improve loading of taller items.
Interior space and practicality
Inside the cabin, both models offer comparable passenger room and comfort, but the form factor nudges them in different directions. The Forester emphasizes headroom and a roomy feel thanks to its upright design, while the Outback emphasizes a sedan-like cabin with a lower, more streamlined profile.
To help visualize the differences, consider these qualitative points:
- Headroom and visibility: Forester generally provides more vertical space and a taller, more open feel in the cabin.
- Load height and access: Outback’s trunk opening is shaped to maximize cargo volume, while Forester’s taller rear opening can make loading bulkier items easier in some configurations.
- Rear-seat comfort: Both offer comfortable rear seating for adults on longer trips, with preferences often depending on whether you value legroom or a higher seating position.
Overall interior space is a close match, with each model favoring a different takeaway: height and ease of entry for the Forester, or a longer, more car-like cabin feel for the Outback.
Practical considerations for buyers
Beyond raw dimensions, practical factors influence which model feels bigger to you in daily use. Consider garage fit, parking, and how you plan to use the space for passengers, cargo, or adventurous gear.
- Garage and parking: The Outback’s longer length can be a factor in tight garages or urban parking.
- Loading tall items: The Forester’s taller roofline can make loading tall boxes or gear easier in some setups.
- Terrain and ground clearance: The Forester generally offers higher ground clearance, which can affect perceived size when traversing rough terrain or snow.
For most shoppers, the differences are nuanced. If you prize a longer overall footprint and similar cargo volume, the Outback is the bigger SUV. If you want a taller, more upright cabin with ample headroom and potentially easier loading of tall items, the Forester is the smarter pick.
Summary
Compared side by side, the Subaru Outback is bigger in overall length and wheelbase, giving it a larger footprint. The Forester, by contrast, offers more interior height and a taller cabin, which can make it feel roomier inside even though it is shorter on the outside. For cargo capacity, both are competitive, with only subtle differences that vary by year and trim. In the end, the choice comes down to whether you need a longer, more sedan-like cargo area (Outback) or a taller, more open interior with easier access to tall items (Forester).
